MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W31965227 · doi:10.4000/ref.508

Fichte: acerca del compromiso social del intelectual. Una aproximación genealógica

2014· article· es· W31965227 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophical Thought and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyArgument (complex analysis)EpistemologyDoctrineIntervention (counseling)Intellectual developmentSociologyHumanitiesOrder (exchange)PsychologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper I attempt at critically analyse Fichte’s conception of intellectuals and intellectual intervention by focussing on the question about the moral and non-philosophical origins of these concepts. In order to prepare the mentioned genealogic analysis: i) I expose what I would like to call the populist or democratic spirit of Fichte’s philosophy; ii) I show at what extent the intellectual intervention is essential to the idea of the doctrine of science; iii) I proceed to a reconstruction of Fichte’s concept of the intellectual based on the argument that the intellectual intervention is the differentia specifica of this concept; and, finally, iv) I present a genetic deduction of the concept of the intellectual based on Fichte’s theory of drives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it