Privacy-Preserving Keyword Similarity Search Over Encrypted Spatial Data in Cloud Computing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the proliferation of cloud computing, data owners can outsource the spatial data from the Internet of Things devices to a cloud server to enjoy the pay-as-you-go storage resources and location-based services. However, the outsourced services may raise privacy concerns, since the cloud server may not be fully trusted for both data owners and search users. If the data owners and search users conventionally encrypt the spatial data and query requests, the efficiency and functionality of query processing are weakened. Most of the existing works only focus on spatial data search or keyword search and do not consider spatial keyword search over encrypted data. In this article, we first design a geometric range query (GRQ) scheme, which can generate an arbitrary geometric range to fit the search user’s desired spatial data while protecting location privacy. Furthermore, based on GRQ, we propose a multidimensional spatial keyword similarity search scheme with access control (MSSAC) by integrating the polynomial function and matrix transformation. Specifically, an access control strategy is defined by a role-based polynomial function, which is embedded in the vectors of indices and trapdoors to achieve efficient and lightweight access control. Moreover, MSSAC enables the cloud server to execute compute-then-compare operations for spatial keyword search in a privacy-preserving manner by leveraging techniques of randomizable permutation and matrix multiplication. The formal security analyses and extensive experiments demonstrate that GRQ and MSSAC preserve the privacy of data owners and search users while achieving efficient spatial keyword search.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it