DeepTaskAPT: Insider APT detection using Task-tree based Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
APT, known as Advanced Persistent Threat, is a difficult challenge for cyber defence. These threats make many traditional defences ineffective as the vulnerabilities exploited by these threats are insiders who have access to and are within the network. This paper proposes DeepTaskAPT, a heterogeneous task-tree based deep learning method to construct a baseline model based on sequences of tasks using a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network that can be applied across different users to identify anomalous behaviour. Rather than applying the model to sequential log entries directly, as most current approaches do, DeepTaskAPT applies a process tree based task generation method to generate sequential log entries for the deep learning model. To assess the performance of DeepTaskAPT, we use a recently released synthetic dataset, DARPA Operationally Transparent Computing (OpTC) dataset and a real-world dataset, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) dataset. Both of them are composed of host-based data collected from sensors. Our results show that DeepTaskAPT outperforms similar approaches e.g. DeepLog and the DeepTaskAPT baseline model demonstrate its capability to detect malicious traces in various attack scenarios while having high accuracy and low false-positive rates. To the best of knowledge this is the very first attempt of using recently introduced OpTC dataset for cyber threat detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".