MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196570003 · doi:10.34117/bjdv7n8-468

Cromodacriorréia em golden retriever – relato de caso / Chromodaryorrhea in golden retriever - case report

2021· article· en· W3196570003 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adriana Castro De Jesus, Larissa Jesus Trombetta, Nathany Arcaten, Gabriela Silva Assis, Fábio Fernandes Bruno Filho, Raphaella Barbosa Meirelles-Bartoli, Alana Flávia Romani, Andréia Vítor Couto do Amaral

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Development · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLabrador RetrieverAnatomySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O objetivo desse trabalho foi relatar um caso de cromodacriorréia, em Golden Retriever, causada por entrópio, e assim contribuir para a literatura e auxiliar o clínico de animais de companhia na especialidade de oftalmologia. Atendeu-se um cão, no Setor de Oftalmologia do Hospital Veterinário da Universidade Federal de Jataí, da raça Golden Retriever, com 18 meses de idade, sob queixa principal de cromodacriorréia bilateral há seis meses, não responsiva a tratamentos anteriores com colírios antibióticos, lubrificantes e modificação da dieta. Durante o exame oftálmico foi observada cromodacriorréia bilateral acentuada, bem como discreta hiperemia conjuntival. Observou-se no olho esquerdo uma inversão acentuada da pálpebra inferior, enquanto do lado direito, discreta inversão. A prova de tingimento pela fluoresceína foi negativa. O teste de Jones foi positivo para ambos os lados evidenciando drenagem eficiente da lágrima e normalidade do ducto nasolacrimal. Concluiu-se que o animal apresentava a cromodacriorréia bilateral devido ao entrópio e foi realizada blefaroplastia Hotz-Celsus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of DevelopmentSame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207