Gonadotrophin‐releasing hormone and kisspeptin: It takes two to tango
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kisspeptin (Kp), a family of peptides comprising products of the Kiss1 gene, was discovered 20 years ago; it is recognised as the major factor controlling the activity of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurones and thus the activation of the reproductive axis in mammals. It has been widely documented that the effects of Kp on reproduction through its action on GnRH neurones are mediated by the GPR54 receptor. Kp controls the activation of the reproductive axis at puberty, maintains reproductive axis activity in adults and is involved in triggering ovulation in some species. Although there is ample evidence coming from both conditional knockout models and conditional-induced Kp neurone death implicating the Kp/GPR54 pathway in the control of reproduction, the mechanism(s) underlying this process may be more complex than a sole direct control of GnRH neuronal activity by Kp. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent advances made in elucidating the interplay between Kp- and GnRH- neuronal networks with respect to regulating the reproductive axis. We highlight the existence of a possible mutual regulation between GnRH and Kp neurones, as well as the implication of Kp-dependent volume transmission in this process. We also discuss the capacity of heterodimerisation between GPR54 and GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) and its consequences on signalling. Finally, we illustrate the role of mathematical modelling that accounts for the synergy between GnRH-R and GPR54 in explaining the role of these two receptors when defining GnRH neuronal activity and GnRH pulsatile release.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".