Automated Object Detection, Mapping, and Assessment of Roadside Clear Zones Using Lidar Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a fully automated approach to map and assess roadside clearance parameters using mobile Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) data on rural highways. Compared with traditional manual surveying methods, lidar data could provide a more efficient and cost-effective source to extract roadside information. This study proposes a novel voxel-based raycasting approach focused primarily on automating roadside mapping and assessment. First, the scanning vehicle trajectory is extracted. Pavement surface points are then detected, and a method is proposed to extract pavement edge trajectories. Once pavement edges are extracted, guardrails were identified using a conical frustum emitted from the edge trajectory points. Target points and flexion points are then generated and located on the roadside, and a voxel-based raycasting approach is used to search for roadside obstacles and query their locations. Finally, roadside slopes and embankment heights were mapped at specific intervals, and roadside design guidelines and requirements were automatically checked against the mapping results. Noncompliant locations with substandard conditions were automatically queried. The method was tested on four highway segments in Alberta, Canada. The accuracy of the edge detection reached up to 98.5%. Furthermore, the method proved to be accurate in object detection, being able to detect all obstructions on the roadside in each tested segment. The proposed method can help transportation authorities automatically map and inventory roadside clearance parameters. Moreover, the safety performance of existing road infrastructure can be studied using collected information and crash data to support decision making on road maintenance and upgrades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".