MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196630514 · doi:10.7748/mhp.19.7.10.s10

Love, Fear, and Health: How Our Attachments to Others Shape Health and Health Care Maunder Robert and Hunter Jonathan Love, Fear, and Health: How Our Attachments to Others Shape Health and Health Care 344pp £17.99 University of Toronto Press 9781442615601 1442615605

2016· article· en· W3196630514 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angela Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueMental Health Practice · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMental Health and Psychiatry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyAffect (linguistics)Health riskSocial psychologyHealth careMedicineCommunicationEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WRITTEN BY two psychiatrists, this book examines how the ways we relate to others can affect our health. A practical, clinically-focused introduction to the influence of our close relationships on disease and risk, it explains how understanding attachment – which is the means by which people seek security in their close relationships – can transform patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMental Health PracticeSame topicMental Health and PsychiatryFrench-language works237,207