MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196732802 · doi:10.1161/hyp.78.suppl_1.p152

Abstract P152: Low Memory Recall And High Common Carotid Artery Flow Pulsatility In Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

2021· article· en· W3196732802 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ninette Shenouda, Nicholas V. Chouramanis, Matthew L. Cohen, Raymond R. Townsend, David G. Edwards

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyTranscranial DopplerInternal medicineKidney diseaseMontreal Cognitive AssessmentRenal functionDialysisCerebral blood flowEpisodic memoryCognitionDiseaseDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A significant proportion of patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) present with mild-to-moderate deficits in the cognitive domains of executive function and episodic memory. Excess blood flow pulsatility is damaging to the microvasculature of high-flow, low-resistance organs like the brain and may contribute to the cognitive deficits prevalent among CKD patients. We tested the hypothesis that patients with moderate-to-severe non-dialysis CKD have excess flow pulsatility along their carotid and cerebral vasculature that is associated with deficits in executive function and episodic memory. We recruited 10 non-dialysis CKD patients (age=68±8 yrs; estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR=36±18 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and 7 healthy age-matched adults (age=65±5 yrs; eGFR=81±17 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Global cognitive function was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Executive function and episodic memory were assessed using the NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test and California Verbal Learning Test III, respectively, and reported as standardized scores (mean=100, SD=15). Pulsatility index [(systolic blood velocity - diastolic blood velocity)/ mean blood velocity] was measured in the common carotid (CCA), internal carotid (ICA), and middle cerebral arteries (MCA) via Doppler and transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Compared to healthy adults, CKD patients did not differ in total brain blood flow (p=0.42) but had lower MoCA (CKD=26±3, Healthy=29±1; p=0.01) and memory recall scores (CKD=92±21, Healthy=110±9; p=0.05). CKD patients did not differ from our healthy control group in executive function (CKD=91±10, Healthy=90±11; p=0.80) but did produce a mean score that was 0.6 SD lower than the NIH Toolbox reference sample. CKD patients had a higher pulsatility index in the CCA (CKD=2.3±0.5, Healthy=1.9±0.3; p=0.05) but not in the ICA (p=0.68) or MCA (p=0.57). CCA pulsatility index was strongly and inversely associated with episodic memory recall scores (r=-0.64, p<0.01, n=17). This data suggests that although the higher CCA flow pulsatility in non-dialysis CKD patients does not appear to be transmitted to the cerebrovasculature, it nevertheless may still be contributing to memory impairments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207