Bibliographic record
Abstract
The back entrance of the Copenhagen Central Station has for some decades been shelter
 and meeting place for alcoholics, drug abusers and drug dealers, because this part of the
 Central Station faces a part of the town which for more than a hundred years has
 accommodated prostitution in general, and since the legalisation of selling pornographic
 films and pictures in 1969 also shops and cinemas for that purpose. When hash and
 narcotics entered the milieu of prostitution this part of town – called Istedgade kvarteret
 (Isted Street Quarter) – became also domicile of junkies, drug dealers and prostitutes
 dependent on narcotics. After a radical restoration of the Central Station in the 1990’s the
 management wanted to get rid of the abusers in the back entrance. So did many travellers.
 And as the police did not succeed they bought a music concept from the central station
 in Hamburg, which had proved its efficiency there. By playing music from the period of
 romanticism (about 1800-1860) from a loudspeaker they stressed the abusers so much
 that they after a few days of persistence left the entrance hall. Now the question is: what
 made them leave? – It is well known that music has been used for psychological purposes,
 in super markets, in films, in wars and as means of torture. But why should music from
 exactly that historical period affect the abusers? Most of the junkies and alcoholics are
 not familiar with nor attracted to classical romanticism. They have through their whole
 are anthropologists, who do not settle for surfaces, but insist on reflecting on their own
 incorporated cultural learning processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".