MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196804222 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2021.3107897

Topological Interference Management With Inaccurate Topology of Network

2021· article· en· W3196804222 on OpenAlexaff
Xue Jiang, Baoyu Zheng, Wei‐Ping Zhu, Lei Wang, Xiaoyun Hou

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTopology (electrical circuits)Network topologyRank (graph theory)Interference (communication)Computer scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)Extension topologyLogical topologyLow-rank approximationGeneral topologyMathematicsAlgorithmComputer networkDiscrete mathematicsTopological spaceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we investigate the topological interference management (TIM) problem in the presence of measurement error of the network topology. We formulate the TIM problem as a low-rank matrix recovery problem and then solve it through an alternating algorithm to recover the true network topology. Our numerical results demonstrate that the proposed low-rank matrix recovery model can significantly improve the achievable degrees of freedom of the network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207