MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196807941

Supporting Transportation Decision-Makers with Tool Design and Data Uncertainty Visualizations

2020· article· en· W3196807941 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nasim Sharbatdar

Bibliographic record

VenuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesBusinessArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transportation decision-makers from government agencies play an important role in addressing the traffic network conditions, which in turn, have a major impact on the well-being of citizens.The practices, challenges, and needs of this group of practitioners are less represented in the HCI literature.On the other hand, there is a gap for tools that can fulfill decision-makers' needs and help them monitor and analyze traffic conditions on the road network.Additionally, almost all transportation data have some uncertainty, and good communication of data uncertainty through visualizations can have a great effect on the quality of the decisions that transportation experts make.However, there is little knowledge about how transportation decision-makers deal with uncertain data and perceive data uncertainty visualizations.We address these gaps first through an interview study with 19 practitioners from Transports Qubec (MTQ), a government agency responsible for transportation infrastructures in Qubec, Canada.We then created design guidelines based on the results of these interviews and designed a user interface for traffic conditions analysis.The user interface design was evaluated and iterated through short user studies with 6 practitioners working at MTQ.To help transportation practitioners understand and address data uncertainty, we proposed a novel method and applied Jensen-Shannon Divergence (JSD) to quantify data uncertainty in traffic speed.We later used several visualization techniques such as color, shape, and size to create uncertainty visualizations that present the levels of data uncertainty in overlapping with the original speed data.We then conducted a user study with 11 expert and novice transportation decision-makers to explore how practitioners consider data uncertainty in their decision-making process and also understand their preferences and perceptions on our data uncertainty visualizations.In our research, we found that decision-makers who work on monitoring and analyzing traffic conditions on the road network can most benefit from research about data analysis tools and platforms that (1) provide information to support data quality awareness, (2) are interoperable with other tools in the complex workflow of the practitioners, and (3) support intuitive and customizable visual analytics.These implications can also be informative to the design of tools supporting other decision-making tasks and domains.In addition, transportation practitioners found our tool design to be useful in helping them understand and analyze their data.They also pointed out that flexible data filtering, choice of visualization selection, and data comparisons features on a single user-friendly interface can be very beneficial for viii their decision-making process.Further, our user study about data uncertainty revealed the important challenges that practitioners faced when dealing with uncertain data, such as bias in data collection, human and device errors, and lack of trust in third-party data providers.Our JSD-based uncertainty quantification method was generally well perceived by the participants to help achieve better transparency and awareness of their data.Additionally, the user study results indicated that factors such as familiarity to the representations, existing connotations of the visualization based on practice, and the goals of data usage influenced the participants' preferences on data uncertainty visualizations.In summation, the results of this thesis can be used to create better visual analysis tools to support practitioners in the transportation-decision making practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)Same topicData Visualization and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207