MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196827467 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20044963

Evaluation of a Rapid Test for NEFA in Bovine Serum

2004· article· en· W3196827467 on OpenAlexaff
L. Gooijer, K.E. Leslie, T.F. Duffield, S.J. LeBlanc, Nathan Perkins, E. Vernooy

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNEFAKetosisIce calvingEndocrinologyInternal medicineMedicineSubclinical infectionAnimal scienceChemistryBiologyLactationPregnancyDiabetes mellitusInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excessive or prolonged periparturient negative energy balance (NEB) is an important issue for dairy producers, and may be associated with increased risk of clinical disease and impaired production and reproductive performance. Affected cows commonly have elevated circulating levels of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) prior to calving and increased beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) postpartum. Monitoring the incidence of subclinical ketosis postpartum has been the recommended method of surveillance for this problem. Prepartum, blood NEFA concentration may be used to detect cows at risk for problems with severe NEB. Serum NEFA greater than 0.4 mEq/L NEFA has been proposed to identify excessive prepartum NEB. Measuring NEFA has traditionally involved submission of serum to a diagnostic laboratory. The DVM NEFA test (Veterinary Diagnostics. Newburg, Wisconsin, USA) is a new, rapid, spectophotometry method to determine NEFA concentration in serum through light absorbance. The objective of this study was to determine the test characteristics of the DVM NEFA test and its usefulness as a method of identifying problems with NEB in prepartum dairy cows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207