A radiolucent bronchial foreign body in a two‐ and a half‐month‐old Labrador Retriever with acute onset respiratory distress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A two‐ and a half‐month‐old intact male Labrador Retriever was presented to the Texas A&M University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital for acute onset respiratory distress with concern for a potential foreign body. Upon intake by the emergency service, the puppy was exhibiting expiratory dyspnoea. Radiographs revealed marked gas distension of the oesophagus and stomach. No radiopaque foreign bodies were identified. Bronchoscopy revealed a dark brown foreign body in the right middle lobe bronchus. The foreign material was pliable and crumbled upon removal attempts with a snare retrieval device. The majority of the foreign body was removed en masse; it most closely resembled faecal material. Three‐view thoracic radiographs performed 1 day post‐endoscopy revealed aspiration pneumonia. The dog was discharged from the hospital with doxycycline, and the pneumonia was nearly resolved at the 1‐week recheck. The dog was sent home with another 2 weeks of doxycycline and made a full recovery at home.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".