Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dataset discovery can be performed using search (with a query or keywords) to find relevant data. However, the result of this discovery can be overwhelming to explore. Existing navigation techniques mostly focus on linkage graphs that enable navigation from one data set to another based on similarity or joinability of attributes. However, users often do not know which data set to start the navigation from. RONIN proposes an alternative way to navigate by building a hierarchical structure on a collection of data sets: the user navigates between groups of data sets in a hierarchical manner to narrow down to the data of interest. We demonstrate RONIN, a tool that enables user exploration of a data lake by seamlessly integrating the two common modalities of discovery: data set search and navigation of a hierarchical structure. In RONIN, a user can perform a keyword search or joinability search over a data lake, then, navigate the result using a hierarchical structure, called an organization , that is created on the fly. While navigating an organization, the user may switch to the search mode, and back to navigation on an organization that is updated based on search. This integration of search and navigation provides great power in allowing users to find and explore interesting data in a data lake.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it