Mutual Variational Inference: An Indirect Variational Inference Approach for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the unsupervised domain adaptation problem, where an approximate inference model is to be learned from a labeled dataset and expected to generalize well on an unlabeled dataset, is considered. Unlike the existing work, we explicitly unveil the importance of the latent variables produced by the feature extractor, that is, encoder, where contains the most representative information about their input samples, for the knowledge transfer. We argue that an estimator of the representation of the two datasets can be used as an agent for knowledge transfer. To be specific, a novel variational inference approach is proposed to approximate a latent distribution from the unlabeled dataset that can be used to accurately predict its input samples. It is demonstrated that the discriminative knowledge of the latent distribution that is learned from the labeled dataset can be progressively transferred to that is learned from the unlabeled dataset by simultaneously optimizing the estimator via the variational inference and our proposed regularization for shifting the mean of the estimator. The experiments on several benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods for both object classification and digit classification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".