Impacts of river of life project towards the conservation of urban heritage quarter in Kuala Lumpur: a preliminary study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The River of Life (RoL) is one project of Malaysia’s Economic Transformation Programmes. RoL is a multi-year attempt that integrates high-impact programmes to help Malaysia achieve a status of a developed nation. This study discussed the components of the waterfront development packages in the River of Life (RoL) project implementation. As explained by urban planning theory, the growth of a city is affected by multiple factors. The word “urban regeneration” originated to define the social, economic, and environmental components that influence a city’s growth. This study intended to examine the socioeconomic impact of the RoL project in the Kuala Lumpur heritage quarter in terms of development. A qualitative method approach combining interviews and document reviews were used in this study. The study revealed the impacts of RoL project within the heritage quarter from the perspectives of the local authorities, private sector as well as stakeholders involved in the project. The study findings will help numerous stakeholders to provide better urban living for the Kuala Lumpur heritage quarter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".