Lo dijo en mi delante. Sobre la construcción «preposición + posesivo + adverbio» en español actual
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este trabajo teórico se aborda la descripción de la construcción preposicional con posesivo antepuesto (mi, tu, su) y ‘adverbio’ de lugar (por su delante, en mi delante), un rasgo documentado en las variedades del español andino (Bolivia, Perú, Ecuador y sur de Colombia), pero cuyo uso en español actual se extiende a otras áreas dialectales. El estudio responde a cuatro objetivos: (1) establecer dónde se registra el fenómeno en español actual, en qué persona y número aparece el posesivo antepuesto, qué preposiciones lo encabezan y qué valores se atribuyen a esta construcción; (2) argumentar a favor del carácter nominal del adverbio delante, considerar este fenómeno como uno más dentro de la ‘redundancia’ del español actual y revisar su proceso de analogía y la progresión a otras piezas adverbiales; y (3) reconsiderar la explicación de calco funcional y su normatividad, ante las evidencias de que este fenómeno no contradice los modelos propios de la lengua española.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".