MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197078525 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.202434

Implementing machine learning in medicine

2021· letter· en· W3197078525 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Amol A. Verma, Joshua Murray, Russell Greiner, Joseph Cohen, Kaveh G Shojania, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Sharon E. Straus, Chloé Pou-Prom, Muhammad Mamdani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of TorontoAlberta Machine Intelligence Institute
KeywordsComputer scienceKey (lock)Process (computing)Artificial intelligenceMachine learningComputer securityProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[See related articles at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.202066][1] and [www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.210036][2] KEY POINTS Machine learning — the process of developing systems that learn from data to recognize patterns and make accurate predictions of future events[1][3] — has

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.074
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.074
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0140.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations136
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicMachine Learning in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207