MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197096630 · doi:10.1109/jestie.2021.3107754

A Link-Independent Hybrid Inductive and Capacitive Wireless Power Transfer System for Autonomous Mobility

2021· article· en· W3197096630 on OpenAlexafffund
Deepa Vincent, Phuoc Sang Huynh, Sheldon S. Williamson

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWireless power transferMaximum power transfer theoremCapacitive sensingInverterTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringWirelessPower (physics)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A link-independent hybrid wireless power transfer system (HPT) that uses both capacitive and inductive action for autonomous vehicle charging application is presented in this article. A three-leg inverter topology is utilized here. Two legs of the inverter, switched at 85 kHz, are used for inductive wireless power transfer (IPT) and the third leg, switched at 1 MHz, is used for capacitive wireless power transfer (CPT). The three-leg inverter module is realized using SiC and GaN switches. The dual switching frequency operation of the converter enables independent compensation techniques to be adopted for IPT and CPT, bringing the modularity feature in the HPT. The circular inductive-link outer diameter is 460 mm and the parallel plate capacitive-link dimension is 600 mm × 600 mm. The power transfer distance or air gap is 100 mm between both links. The output power ratio of IPT to CPT is 2:1. The effectiveness of the proposed topology is validated experimentally. The advantages of this HPT system are modular-link architecture, improved misalignment performance, and distinct frequency of operation for each link that allows the inductive link to meet the SAEJ2954 standard frequency limits compared with the existing HPT systems proposed for electric vehicle charging to support autonomous mobility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial ElectronicsSame topicWireless Power Transfer SystemsFrench-language works237,207