Multiscale communication in cortico-cortical networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Signaling in brain networks unfolds over multiple topological scales. Areas may exchange information over local circuits, encompassing direct neighbours and areas with similar functions, or over global circuits, encompassing distant neighbours with dissimilar functions. Here we study how the organization of cortico-cortical networks mediate localized and global communication by parametrically tuning the range at which signals are transmitted on the white matter connectome. We show that brain regions vary in their preferred communication scale. By investigating the propensity for brain areas to communicate with their neighbors across multiple scales, we naturally reveal their functional diversity: unimodal regions show preference for local communication and multimodal regions show preferences for global communication. We show that these preferences manifest as region- and scale-specific structure-function coupling. Namely, the functional connectivity of unimodal regions emerges from monosynaptic communication in small-scale circuits, while the functional connectivity of transmodal regions emerges from polysynaptic communication in large-scale circuits. Altogether, the present findings reveal that communication preferences are highly heterogeneous across the cortex, shaping regional differences in structure-function coupling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".