Le tandem Dhomont-Vande Gorne : la connexion acousmatique Québec/Belgique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les liens entre Francis Dhomont et Annette Vande Gorne, tous deux acousmates passionnés et pédagogues, ont animé le développement d’un nouveau corpus d’oeuvres et marqué les paysages acousmatiques québécois et belge, en particulier entre 1980 et la fin des années 1990. L’article propose de retracer le parcours complice de Dhomont et de Vande Gorne à travers les moments les plus marquants de cette période. S’y dessine un profond attachement pour l’espace sonore et ses déclinaisons dans des concerts spatialisés, tout autant que pour un enseignement novateur. Leurs remarquables carrières respectives sont ponctuées de contributions réflexives importantes pour définir ce qui distingue et caractérise la musique acousmatique. Enfin, on y relate les événements et les collaborations qui ont fourni aux jeunes acousmates d’alors l’occasion d’approfondir leur art et de faire connaître leurs musiques pour les uns en Europe et les autres en Amérique du Nord.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".