MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197247274

THE EVOLUTION AND MATURITY OF SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE THROUGH THE YEARS: THE POWER OF THE SIMULATED EXPERIENCE

2021· article· en· W3197247274 on OpenAlexaff
Cory Ross, Michael Eliadis

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Education and Research Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsGeorge Brown College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarketing buzzField (mathematics)Maturity (psychological)Computer scienceInclusion (mineral)Health careFidelityAutomotive industryPower (physics)Healthcare deliveryArtificial intelligencePsychologyEngineeringPolitical scienceTelecommunicationsMathematicsWorld Wide WebSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulation is no longer a buzz word that is attached to the aeronautical industry or automotive sector. In the last ten years the use of sophisticated simulation has become a mainstay in the healthcare field. Simulated models ranging from low fidelity models to high fidelity mannequins are being utilized in clinical training. The inclusion recently of machine learning and artificial intelligence is becoming predominant in the field of simulation. With all these great advances in the field of simulation it is important to understand the trajectory of growth in this burgeoning field. It is truly a field of practice where healthcare providers and teachers must respect the past and embrace the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.012
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.578
Teacher spread0.451 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Education and Research JournalSame topicElectronic Health Records SystemsFrench-language works237,207