MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197247626 · doi:10.4095/327942

Seismic imaging of porphyry deposits with distributed acoustic sensing of fibre-optic cables: a summary of results at the New Afton Cu-Au mine, British Columbia

2021· report· en· W3197247626 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gilles Bellefleur, Ernst Schetselaar, Don White

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyDistributed acoustic sensingMining engineeringRemote sensingOptical fiberTelecommunicationsEngineeringFiber optic sensor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a summary of physical rock properties and vertical seismic profiling (VSP) results acquired with distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) in boreholes that intersect the main mineralized zone and alteration halo at the New Afton Cu-Au porphyry deposit, British Columbia. We used an advanced DAS system that achieves signal-to-noise ratio of conventional geophones but offers high-density sensing of the entire fibre-optic cable. Straight and helically wound fibre-optic cables specifically engineered for the advanced DAS system were installed in two boreholes and compared with conventional fibre-optic cables with similar configurations connected to a standard DAS interrogator. Comparison of raw field data and processed data of both systems demonstrates a significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio for the new DAS system. Processed VSP data show several reflections with shallow dips that are mostly explained by faults and fractures observed in wireline logs and intersecting the surveyed boreholes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207