Distributed Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Energy and Emission Management Strategy for Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advanced algorithms can promote the development of energy management strategies (EMSs) as a key technology in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). Reinforcement learning (RL) with distributed structure can significantly improve training efficiency in complex environments, and multi-threaded parallel computing provides a reliable algorithm basis for promoting adaptability. Dedicated to trying more efficient deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms, this paper proposed a deep q-network (DQN)-based energy and emission management strategy (E&EMS) at first. Then, two distributed DRL algorithms, namely asynchronous advantage actor-critic (A3C) and distributed proximal policy optimization (DPPO), were adopted to propose EMSs, respectively. Finally, emission optimization was taken into account and then distributed DRL-based E&EMSs were proposed. Regarding dynamic programming (DP) as the optimal benchmark, simulation results show that three DRL-based control strategies can achieve near-optimal fuel economy and outstanding computational efficiency, and compared with DQN, two distributed DRL algorithms have improved the learning efficiency by four times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".