MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197248855 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2021.3106793

Input-to-State Stability for Time-Delay Systems With Large Delays

2021· article· en· W3197248855 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStability (learning theory)Control theory (sociology)State (computer science)Computer scienceControl (management)AlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we consider the input-to-state stability (ISS) problem for a class of time-delay systems with intermittent large delays, which may cause the invalidation of traditional delay-dependent stability criteria. The topic of this article features that it proposes a novel kind of stability criterion for time-delay systems, which is delay dependent if the time delay is smaller than a prescribed allowable size. While if the time delay is larger than the allowable size, the ISS can be preserved as well provided that the large-delay periods satisfy the kind of duration condition. Different from existing results on similar topics, we present the main result based on a unified Lyapunov-Krasovskii function (LKF). In this way, the frequency restriction can be removed and the analysis complexity can be simplified. A numerical example is provided to verify the proposed results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it