MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197250466 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2021.3110661

Kramers-Kronig Optical OFDM for Bandlimited Intensity Modulated Visible Light Communications

2021· article· en· W3197250466 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBandlimitingOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingVisible light communicationSidebandOptical powerCompatible sideband transmissionIntensity modulationBit error rateSpectral efficiencyElectronic engineeringOpticsMathematicsPhysicsTelecommunicationsComputer sciencePhase noisePhase modulationFourier transformRadio frequencyLight-emitting diodeEngineeringMathematical analysisChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visible light communication (VLC) operates on optical intensity channels that are inherently limited in bandwidth. Though Kramers-Kronig (KK) receivers have been considered as a lower complexity alternative for coherent fiber optic communication (FOC) systems, in this paper we extend this concept to bandlimited IM/DD VLC channels and propose KK optical OFDM (KKO-OFDM). In KKO-OFDM the optical power of a low-cost LED is directly modulated by the double-sideband (DSB) squared modulus of a minimum phase single-sideband (SSB) signal. This results in a real-valued, non-negative and strictly bandlimited transmit signal which is suitable for VLC channels. At the receiver, the phase of the transmitted SSB signal is reconstructed via the KK relations. The required DC bias, average electrical signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), bit error rate (BER), and capacity are analyzed with approximate closed-forms and through simulation. Numerical results show that KKO-OFDM achieves the same spectral efficiency as the existing DC biased optical OFDM (DCO-OFDM), however, realizes approximately 1 dB optical SNR gain at a BER <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$=10^{-4}$</tex-math></inline-formula> while simultaneously having a small peak-to-average power ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it