MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197310284 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2021.3105551

Dense Point Cloud Completion Based on Generative Adversarial Network

2021· article· en· W3197310284 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPoint cloudComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Ground truthDiscriminatorArtificial intelligencePoint (geometry)Cloud computingEncoderData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Point cloud completion aims to reconstruct complete point clouds from partial point clouds, which is widely used in various fields such as autonomous driving and robotics. Most existing methods are sparse point cloud completion, where the number of point clouds after completion is relatively small and the details are insufficient. This article proposes a novel end-to-end generative adversarial network-based dense point cloud completion architecture (DPCG-Net). We design two generative adversarial network (GAN)-based modules that translate point cloud completion into mapping between global feature distributions obtained by encoding partial point clouds and ground truth, respectively. The first designed generator module proposes skip connections to fully connected layer-based network for regenerating global feature and changing the global feature distribution derived from the encoder module to approximate the ground truth global feature distribution. The second proposed discriminator module divides high-dimensional global feature vectors into several smaller batches for judgment to guarantee the similarity between the regenerated global feature and the ground truth. We perform quantitative and qualitative experiments on the ShapeNet and KITTI datasets. Experiments on ShapeNet demonstrate that our model outperforms other models in cases where the lack of a large proportion of point clouds results in a large loss of spatial structure, especially when 80% of point clouds are missing. Moreover, KITTI experiments reveal that it is also valid for realistic situations. In addition, application in classification shows that the classification accuracy of point clouds completed with DPCG-Net is as high as 86.5% under the condition of 80% missing point clouds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it