MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197324794 · doi:10.1109/msp.2021.3105941

Audio-Based Musical Version Identification: Elements and challenges

2021· preprint· en· W3197324794 on OpenAlexaff
Furkan Yesiler, Guillaume Doras, Rachel Bittner, Christopher J. Tralie, Joan Serrà

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityBridging (networking)Computer scienceIdentification (biology)MusicalDeep learningData scienceKey (lock)Artificial intelligenceComputer securityVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Creating novel interpretations of existing musical compositions is and has always been an essential part of musical practice. Before the advent of recorded music, listening to a piece of music mostly meant listening to a version of it, in many cases, performed by musicians other than the original composer or performer. While this practice, along with musical notation, allows compositions to remain known for many decades or even centuries, it also provides room for artistic expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing MagazineSame topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207