MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

FindingNemo Extraction 4: Circulomics Kit v1

2021· preprint· en· W3197338027 on OpenAlexaff
Inswasti Cahyani, John R. Tyson, Nadine Holmes, Josh Quick, Nicholas J. Loman, Matthew Loose

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinionProtocol (science)DNA extractionDNA sequencerNanopore sequencingComputer scienceDNA sequencingDNAComputational biologyHomogeneousExtraction (chemistry)BiologyChromatographyChemistryMathematicsGeneticsPolymerase chain reactionMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a sub-protocol designed to extract/isolate ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) DNA to obtain ultra-long (UL) reads on Nanopore sequencers using the Circulomics Nanobind CBB Big DNA Kit. A DNA extraction protocol that yields clean and homogeneous UHMW DNA is important for a good UL sequencing output. The choice of protocol should be based on achieving these parameters. The Circulomics Nanobind CBB Big DNA Kit was initially the recommended extraction protocol for UL sequencing using SQK-ULK001. We tested this sub-protocol in human cell line, with standard input cells of 6 millions. As a rule of thumb, a million cells will suffice for one load on a MinION.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering→French-language works237,207→