Minimizing total absolute deviation of job completion times on a single machine with maintenance activities using a Lion Optimization Algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scheduling is a decision-making process that plays an important role in the service and production industries. Effective scheduling can assist companies to survive in the competitive market. Single machine scheduling is an important optimization problem in the scheduling research area. It can be found in a wide range of real-world engineering problems, from manufacturing to computer science. Due to the high complexity of single machine scheduling problems, developing approximation methods, particularly metaheuristic algorithms, for solving them have absorbed considerable attention. In this study, a Lion Optimization Algorithm (LOA) is employed to solve a single machine with maintenance activities, where the objective is to minimize the Total Absolute Deviation of Compilation Times (TADC). In the scheduling literature, TADC as an objective function has hardly been studied. To evaluate the performance of the LOA, it was compared against a set of well-known metaheuristics. Therefore, a set of problem was generated, and a comprehensive experimental analysis was conducted. The results of computational experiments indicate the superiority of the proposed optimization method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it