MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3197356380

L'apocalisse nell'Islam

2011· article· it· W3197356380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Pierre Filiu

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamPolitical sciencePhilosophyTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dalla rivolta della Mecca nel 1979 alla seconda guerra del Golfo, dalle minacce nucleari del regime iraniano all'escalation di terrore di Al-Qaida, la storia recente del mondo islamico è pervasa da innumerevoli correnti di pensiero rivolte a un'imminente apocalisse, capaci di influenzare stili di vita e determinare orientamenti politici.Forme diffuse di propaganda rielaborano motivi della tradizione coranica intrecciandoli con figure e temi estranei all'immaginario islamico: l'Anticristo e il Mahdi, l'Armageddon, l'Apocalisse cristiana, l'antisemitismo dei Protocolli dei Savi di Sion, le profezie di Nostradamus, i dischi volanti del Triangolo delle Bermude.Jean-Pierre Filiu propone la prima analisi documentata sull'origine e l'evoluzione delle tematiche millenariste ed escatologiche nel mondo islamico contemporaneo, dal Canada al Sud-est asiatico, individuandone i codici e le connessioni più nascoste.Se “le credenze di un popolo riguardo alla fine del mondo riflettono il suo punto di vista sul presente”, i profeti islamici dell'apocalisse rappresentano una dimensione socio-politica della massima serietà.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicBiblical Studies and Interpretation→French-language works237,207→