Nurse Staffing Practices and Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Among Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Multisite Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent complication of cardiac surgery that is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. Recent studies suggest that nurse staffing practices are associated with adverse postoperative events, but whether these practices are also related to POAF occurrence is unknown. Methods To fill this knowledge gap, a cohort of 6401 cardiac surgery patients admitted to 2 Canadian university health centres (UHC A and UHC B) between 2014 and 2018 was studied. Patients' cumulative exposure to 4 staffing practices (registered nurse [RN] understaffing, education, experience, and non-RN skill mix) was measured every shift over the first 6 postoperative days, during which 96% of POAF cases occur. The associations of these exposures with in-hospital POAF occurrence were estimated using site-specific multivariable logistic regression models and a mixed-effect model combining data from both sites. Results Overall, 563 (27.2%) and 1336 (30.8%) cases of POAF occurred at UHC A and UHC B, respectively. In site-specific models, every 5% increase in the cumulative proportion of understaffed shifts over the first 6 postoperative days was associated with a 3.5% increase in the odds of POAF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for UHC A: 1.035; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.000-1.070, P = 0.0472; aOR for UHC B: 1.035; 95% CI: 1.013-1.057, P = 0.0019). In the mixed-effect model combining data from both sites, RN understaffing remained significant and was associated with a 3.1% increase in the odds of POAF (aOR: 1.031; 95% CI: 1.014-1.048, P = 0.0003). No other staffing practices were significantly associated with POAF occurrence. Conclusion Higher RN understaffing postoperatively is associated with increased POAF occurrence among cardiac surgery patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".