Target Detection Through Riemannian Geometric Approach With Application to Drone Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radar detection of small drones in presence of noise and clutter is considered from a differential geometry viewpoint. The drone detection problem is challenging due to low radar cross section (RCS) of drones, especially in cluttered environments and when drones fly low and slow in urban areas. This paper proposes two detection techniques, the Riemannian-Brauer matrix (RBM) and the angle-based hybrid-Brauer (ABHB), to improve the probability of drone detection under small sample size and low signal-to-clutter ratio (SCR). These techniques are based on the regularized Burg algorithm (RBA), the Brauer disc (BD) theorem, and the Riemannian mean and distance. Both techniques exploit the RBA to obtain a Toeplitz Hermitian positive definite (THPD) covariance matrix from each snapshot and apply the BD theorem to cluster the clutter-plus-noise THPD covariance matrices. The proposed Riemannian-Brauer matrix technique is based on the Riemannian distance between the Riemannian mean of clutter-plus-noise cluster and potential targets. The proposed angle-based hybrid-Brauer technique uses the Euclidean tangent space and the Riemannian geodesical distances between the Riemannian mean, the Riemannian median and the potential target point. The angle at the potential target on the manifold is computed using the law of cosines on the manifold. The proposed detection techniques show advantage over the fast Fourier transform, the Riemannian distance-based matrix and the Kullback-Leibler (KLB) divergence detectors. The validity of both proposed techniques are demonstrated with real data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".