Joint Power Allocation and Bit-Loading for Multicarrier Systems with Discrete Modulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose two algorithms for joint power allocation and bit-loading in multicarrier systems using discrete modulations. The objective is to maximize the data rate under the constraint of a suitable Bit Error Rate per subcarrier. The first algorithm is based on the Lagrangian Relaxation of the discrete optimization problem in order to find an initial solution. A discrete solution is found by bit truncation followed by an iterative modulation adjustment. The second algorithm is based on Discrete Coordinate Ascent framework with iterative modulation increment of one selected subcarrier at each iteration. A simple cost function related to the power increment per bit is used for subcarrier selection. A sub-optimal low complexity Discrete Coordinate Ascent algorithm is proposed that overcome the limitations of the Hughes-Hartogs algorithm. The Lagrangian Relaxation algorithm provides a suboptimal solution for non-coded system using M-QAM modulations, whereas the low complexity Discrete Coordinate Ascent algorithm provides a near optimal solution for coded as well as for non-coded system using an arbitrary modulation set. Numerical results show the efficiency of the proposed algorithms in comparison with traditional methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".