MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3197470519 · doi:10.5194/acp-2021-719

Long Range Prediction and the Stratosphere

2021· article· en· W3197470519 on OpenAlexaff
Adam A. Scaife, Mark Baldwin, Amy H. Butler, Andrew Charlton‐Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Steven C. Hardiman, Peter Haynes, Alexey Yu. Karpechko, Eun‐Pa Lim, Shunsuke Noguchi, Judith Perlwitz, Lorenzo M. Polvani, Jadwiga H. Richter, John Scinocca, Michael Sigmond, Theodore G. Shepherd, Seok‐Woo Son, David W. J. Thompson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilNatural Environment Research CouncilMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaMet OfficeNational Research FoundationSight Research UKNational Research Foundation of KoreaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungU.S. Department of EnergyAustralian GovernmentNational Science FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceDepartment for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK GovernmentBiological and Environmental ResearchDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
KeywordsStratosphereTroposphereClimatologyEnvironmental scienceRange (aeronautics)Atmospheric sciencesClimate modelMeteorologyClimate changeGeographyGeologyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Over recent years there have been parallel advances in the development of stratosphere resolving numerical models, our understanding of stratosphere-troposphere interaction and the extension of long-range forecasts to explicitly include the stratosphere. These advances are now allowing new and improved capability in long range prediction. We present an overview of this development and show how the inclusion of the stratosphere in forecast systems aids monthly, seasonal and decadal climate predictions. We end with an outlook towards the future of climate forecasts and identify areas for improvement that could further benefit these rapidly evolving predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→