The role of numerical analysis in the study of the behaviour of hard-rock pillars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rock pillars can be defined as the in-situ rock between two or more underground openings. However, one aspect that is seldom considered in analysis of hard rock pillars, and indirectly in synthetic rock mass models to determine rock mass strength, is the actual stress level and stress path imposed on the pillar due to the excavation sequence and the location of the pillars within the mine lay out. In this paper we propose to use numerical stress analysis to determine how stresses vary across the excavated pillars in a typical room-and-pillar mine lay out, and thus generate a spatially variable determination of pillar stability. Because of the computational difficulty associated with hybrid modelling of realistic discrete fracture networks, synthetic rock mass modelling is commonly carried out using a 2D approach. By comparing 3D and 2D results for selected cross-sections across, we believe the results of the analysis will provide the opportunity to better constrain the stability implications of a 2D approach to pillar design and synthetic rock mass modelling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".