MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Information Bottleneck Problem with Rényi's Entropy

2021· article· en· W3197491921 on OpenAlex
Jian-Jia Weng, Fady Alajaji, Tamás Linder

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInformation bottleneck methodBottleneckInformation theoryMutual informationEntropy (arrow of time)Computer scienceRényi entropyMathematicsDecoding methodsJoint entropyMultiplicative functionMathematical optimizationTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmPrinciple of maximum entropyArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers an information bottleneck problem with the objective of obtaining a most informative representation of a hidden feature subject to a Rényi entropy complexity constraint. The optimal bottleneck trade-off between relevance (measured via Shannon's mutual information) and Rényi entropy cost is defined and an iterative algorithm for finding approximate solutions is provided. We also derive an operational characterization for the optimal trade-off by demonstrating that the optimal Rényi entropy-relevance trade-off is achievable by a simple time-sharing scalar coding scheme and that no coding scheme can provide better performance. Two examples where the optimal Shannon entropy-relevance tradeoff can be exactly determined are further given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207