De la nostalgie postcommuniste à la promesse d’une socialité postsocialiste. Les écrans relationnels de Kateřina Šedá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partant du concept de « nostalgie postcommuniste », introduit par Maria Todorova et Zsuzsa Gille en 2010 pour repenser la façon dont les habitants de l’Europe de l’Est gèrent la mémoire du passé après la chute du communisme, cet article propose une analyse de trois installations de l’artiste tchèque Kateřina Šedá (née en 1977) : It Doesn’t Matter (2005-2007), There’s Nothing There (2003) et Bedřichovice Upon Thames (2011-2015). L’isolement social grandissant observé depuis 1989 et qui se manifeste notamment par l’augmentation du nombre de divorces et d’enfants uniques, ainsi que par la hauteur des clôtures dans les villages, etc., constitue la principale source d’inspiration de l’artiste qui crée des installations sociales en collaboration avec ses « protagonistes ». Utilisant différents écrans comme interface de communication et de relation, Šedá « montre des personnes à d’autres personnes » et, de façon aussi naïve que convaincante, nous rappelle l’importance de la coprésence physique des individus pour une vie commune et une nouvelle socialité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".