Spectrum of Apolipoprotein AI and Apolipoprotein AII Proteoforms and Their Associations With Indices of Cardiometabolic Health: The CARDIA Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background ApoAI (apolipoproteins AI) and apoAII (apolipoprotein AII) are structural and functional proteins of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) which undergo post-translational modifications at specific residues, creating distinct proteoforms. While specific post-translational modifications have been reported to alter apolipoprotein function, the full spectrum of apoAI and apoAII proteoforms and their associations with cardiometabolic phenotype remains unknown. Herein, we comprehensively characterize apoAI and apoAII proteoforms detectable in serum and their post-translational modifications and quantify their associations with cardiometabolic health indices. Methods and Results Using top-down proteomics (mass-spectrometric analysis of intact proteins), we analyzed paired serum samples from 150 CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study participants from year 20 and 25 exams. Measuring 15 apoAI and 9 apoAII proteoforms, 6 of which carried novel post-translational modifications, we quantified associations between percent proteoform abundance and key cardiometabolic indices. Canonical (unmodified) apoAI had inverse associations with HDL cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol efflux, and positive associations with obesity indices (body mass index, waist circumference), and triglycerides, whereas glycated apoAI showed positive associations with serum glucose and diabetes mellitus. Fatty-acid‒modified ApoAI proteoforms had positive associations with HDL cholesterol and efflux, and inverse associations with obesity indices and triglycerides. Truncated and dimerized proteoforms of apoAII were associated with HDL cholesterol (positively) and obesity indices (inversely). Several proteoforms had no significant associations with phenotype. Conclusions Associations between apoAI and AII and cardiometabolic indices are proteoform-specific. These results provide "proof-of-concept" that precise chemical characterization of human apolipoproteins will yield improved insights into the complex pathways through which proteins signify and mediate health and disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".