MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197630678 · doi:10.14482/memor.37.986.102

War and slave resistances in the New Granada Revolution: determining elements for the republican project of abolition of slavery

2019· article· en· W3197630678 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorias · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryAncient historySpanish Civil WarPolitical scienceEconomic historyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen En el presente artículo se pretende comprender las conexiones que se forjaron entre los procesos de la revolución y de la abolición neogranadina, mediante el análisis de la cuestión esclava en medio de la guerra y de las estrategias con las que los esclavos resistieron esta condición y buscaron su libertad. A partir del estudio de diversas fuentes de archivo hemos identificado que (A) la guerra independentista y (B) las resistencias esclavas fueron elementos determinantes del proceso de abolición en la Nueva Granada; dando lugar a una serie de iniciativas antiesclavistas que precedieron el desarrollo del proyecto de abolición iniciado en 1821, con la expedición de la ley de libertad de partos de la república de la Gran Colombia, y aceleraron el desmonte de la esclavitud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemoriasSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207