MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W319773208

Benjamin Franklin's Savage Eloquence: Hoaxes from the Press at Passy, 1782

2008· article· en· W319773208 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carla Mulford

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Philosophical Society: Held at Philadelphia for Promoting Useful Knowledge · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstateSubject (documents)Art historyHoaxMillHistoryLawArtLibrary scienceComputer sciencePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ALMOST as soon as he arrived at l'Hotel de Valentinois, JacquesDonatien Le Ray de Chaumont's lovely estate at Passy along the Seine and in sight of Paris, Franklin started arranging his household for a long stay. Among the items ordered were large supplies of food, along with equipment for domestic and personal use, including a coffee roaster and mill, a sugar grater, and a feather duster that would be used at Franklin's desk.1 And among his goals nearly from the start: to purchase and run a press at Passy. Within months of his late February 1777 arrival, Franklin set about finding type for a press, which he planned on setting up for the printing of congressional and other papers both public and private. Probably during the summer of that year, he approached the famous typefounding family, the Fourniers, about getting type for his press, and special type began arriving as early as September.2 In his first years there, Franklin worked hard to establish a press. He even persuaded a typefounder to move and set up a foundry there.3 By 1782, the Passy press was very well appointed, with standard English and French fonts, with special fonts the Fourniers had made explicitly for his Passy press, and with fonts that his typefounder, a man named Hemery, created.4 Nearly all of these fonts would come into play as Franklin prepared an infrequently discussed but brilliantly satirical, splendidly printed broadsheet, the subject of this essay - a purported Supplement to the Boston Independent Chronicle (dated Boston, March 12 but printed before 22 April 1782).5 The Supplement deserves careful scrutiny for both its qualities as a printed artifact and its qualities as satire crafted during a particularly difficult - and frustrating - time in Franklin's protracted diplomatic mission. Although the Supplement is rarely discussed in a printing craft context, Franklin's printing of the Supplement reminds us of the delight he took in creating hoax or faked documents. That he chose to create and print the Supplement at a particularly difficult time in his diplomacy - on the eve of the delivery to the British administration of Franklin's most complete set of negotiating points for peace - suggests the extent to which the printer's craft challenged his mind and rewarded his emotional life in ways that positively affected his sense of confidence and well-being as an intellectual, a politician, and a diplomat on behalf of British North America. From his earliest years as a printer and propagandist, Franklin took to his press at times crucial to the swaying of public opinion on issues that mattered to him. Given that the Supplement's contents might have left him chargeable for libel, if not for treason, the sleight of hand Franklin engaged in when cobbling the printed text together from several fonts he owned had to have been particularly onerous, but also exhilarating. The broadside Supplement that Franklin ended up circulating contained two different articles, one per side, along with several advertisements. The recto article (on the front side) related to purported wartime atrocities fomented by the British and their Indian allies. The verso article (on the back side) spoke to the problem of wartime imprisonment of colonial Americans and Franklin's consistently frustrated efforts to get the prisoners released. The supposed newspaper issue, in effect an extra, never existed: as a material artifact, it was a hoax newspaper. Its articles are literary hoaxes. The first article, which has received a small bit of attention from those interested in Indian affairs, purports to be a letter by New England militia officer Captain Samuel Gerrish, who is transmitting a letter and series of packages that had been intercepted and seized in their delivery from one James Craufurd to General Haldimand, the British governor of Canada. Franklin's hoax letter includes remarkably violent and ugly representations of American Indians (Iroquoians, Senecas, particularly) alongside uglier representations of British imperial attitudes toward Britons in North America. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Philosophical Society: Held at Philadelphia for Promoting Useful KnowledgeSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207