MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W319773208

Benjamin Franklin's Savage Eloquence: Hoaxes from the Press at Passy, 1782

2008· article· en· W319773208 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carla Mulford

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of the American Philosophical Society: Held at Philadelphia for Promoting Useful Knowledge · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical and Literary Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEstateSubject (documents)Art historyHoaxMillHistoryLawArtLibrary scienceComputer sciencePolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ALMOST as soon as he arrived at l'Hotel de Valentinois, JacquesDonatien Le Ray de Chaumont's lovely estate at Passy along the Seine and in sight of Paris, Franklin started arranging his household for a long stay. Among the items ordered were large supplies of food, along with equipment for domestic and personal use, including a coffee roaster and mill, a sugar grater, and a feather duster that would be used at Franklin's desk.1 And among his goals nearly from the start: to purchase and run a press at Passy. Within months of his late February 1777 arrival, Franklin set about finding type for a press, which he planned on setting up for the printing of congressional and other papers both public and private. Probably during the summer of that year, he approached the famous typefounding family, the Fourniers, about getting type for his press, and special type began arriving as early as September.2 In his first years there, Franklin worked hard to establish a press. He even persuaded a typefounder to move and set up a foundry there.3 By 1782, the Passy press was very well appointed, with standard English and French fonts, with special fonts the Fourniers had made explicitly for his Passy press, and with fonts that his typefounder, a man named Hemery, created.4 Nearly all of these fonts would come into play as Franklin prepared an infrequently discussed but brilliantly satirical, splendidly printed broadsheet, the subject of this essay - a purported Supplement to the Boston Independent Chronicle (dated Boston, March 12 but printed before 22 April 1782).5 The Supplement deserves careful scrutiny for both its qualities as a printed artifact and its qualities as satire crafted during a particularly difficult - and frustrating - time in Franklin's protracted diplomatic mission. Although the Supplement is rarely discussed in a printing craft context, Franklin's printing of the Supplement reminds us of the delight he took in creating hoax or faked documents. That he chose to create and print the Supplement at a particularly difficult time in his diplomacy - on the eve of the delivery to the British administration of Franklin's most complete set of negotiating points for peace - suggests the extent to which the printer's craft challenged his mind and rewarded his emotional life in ways that positively affected his sense of confidence and well-being as an intellectual, a politician, and a diplomat on behalf of British North America. From his earliest years as a printer and propagandist, Franklin took to his press at times crucial to the swaying of public opinion on issues that mattered to him. Given that the Supplement's contents might have left him chargeable for libel, if not for treason, the sleight of hand Franklin engaged in when cobbling the printed text together from several fonts he owned had to have been particularly onerous, but also exhilarating. The broadside Supplement that Franklin ended up circulating contained two different articles, one per side, along with several advertisements. The recto article (on the front side) related to purported wartime atrocities fomented by the British and their Indian allies. The verso article (on the back side) spoke to the problem of wartime imprisonment of colonial Americans and Franklin's consistently frustrated efforts to get the prisoners released. The supposed newspaper issue, in effect an extra, never existed: as a material artifact, it was a hoax newspaper. Its articles are literary hoaxes. The first article, which has received a small bit of attention from those interested in Indian affairs, purports to be a letter by New England militia officer Captain Samuel Gerrish, who is transmitting a letter and series of packages that had been intercepted and seized in their delivery from one James Craufurd to General Haldimand, the British governor of Canada. Franklin's hoax letter includes remarkably violent and ugly representations of American Indians (Iroquoians, Senecas, particularly) alongside uglier representations of British imperial attitudes toward Britons in North America. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,053
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,155

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0140,005
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0460,011

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations22
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of the American Philosophical Society: Held at Philadelphia for Promoting Useful KnowledgeMême sujetHistorical and Literary StudiesTravaux en français237 207