MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197733159 · doi:10.7202/1081059ar

La protection contre la discrimination fondée sur le poids offerte par la Charte des droits et libertés de la personne en matière d’emploi : possibilité de réforme pour mieux lutter contre la grossophobie?

2019· article· fr· W3197733159 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Josiane Rioux Collin

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de droit Université de Sherbrooke · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicObesity and Health Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Constatant l’absence de protection explicite contre la discrimination fondée sur le poids dans la Charte des droits et libertés de la personne du Québec, l’autrice étudie la jurisprudence ayant mobilisé les motifs du handicap et du sexe dans des cas de discrimination fondée sur le poids en milieu de travail. Elle examine ensuite l’opportunité d’ajouter un nouveau motif de discrimination prohibée à l’article 10 de la Charte québécoise en discutant de la pertinence sociale d’une telle modification et en dressant certains parallèles avec l’ajout du motif de l’identité ou de l’expression de genre effectué en 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de droit Université de SherbrookeSame topicObesity and Health PracticesFrench-language works237,207