A Deep Learning–Enabled Electrocardiogram Model for the Identification of a Rare Inherited Arrhythmia: Brugada Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Brugada syndrome is a major cause of sudden cardiac death in young people and has distinctive electrocardiographic (ECG) features. We aimed to develop a deep learning–enabled ECG model for automatic screening for Brugada syndrome to identify these patients at an early point in time, thus allowing for life-saving therapy. Methods A total of 276 ECGs with a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern (276 type 1 Brugada ECGs and another randomly retrieved 276 non-Brugada type ECGs for 1:1 allocation) were extracted from the hospital-based ECG database for a 2-stage analysis with a deep learning model. After trained network for identifying right bundle branch block pattern, we transferred the first-stage learning to the second task to diagnose the type 1 Brugada ECG pattern. The diagnostic performance of the deep learning model was compared with that of board-certified practicing cardiologists. The model was further validated in an independent ECG data set collected from hospitals in Taiwan and Japan. Results The diagnoses by the deep learning model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.96, sensitivity 88.4%, specificity 89.1%) were highly consistent with the standard diagnoses (kappa coefficient 0.78). However, the diagnoses by the cardiologists were significantly different from the standard diagnoses, with only moderate consistency (kappa coefficient 0.63). In the independent ECG cohort, the deep learning model still reached a satisfactory diagnostic performance (AUC 0.89, sensitivity 86.0%, specificity 90.0%). Conclusions We present the first deep learning–enabled ECG model for diagnosing Brugada syndrome, which appears to be a robust screening tool with a diagnostic potential rivalling trained physicians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".