Hybrid wind-municipal solid waste biomass power plant location selection considering waste collection problem: a case study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significant increments of energy demand and the need to decarbonize the existing energy systems motivate policymakers to utilize renewable energy resources. Accordingly, this paper suggests a hybrid electricity generation system that operates with wind and municipal solid waste biomass to generate monotonous currents and protect the environment by using a portion of the urban wastes. To select a hybrid power plant location, Z-number data envelopment analysis is employed considering economic, social, environmental, and strategic factors, in addition to reliability of fuzzy data. Furthermore, a routing problem is solved by the particle swarm optimization algorithm to calculate the optimal cost of urban waste gathering. As a case study, the model is applied to thirty-one cities in Iran; Shahrbabak, Meymeh, and Birjand are three cities selected as optimal hybrid power plant locations. Finally, the sensitivity analysis results indicate the importance of globally adopting land cost and distance from power distribution network factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it