MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197843460 · doi:10.1109/itw48936.2021.9611431

Power-Efficient Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Memristor Implementation

2021· preprint· en· W3197843460 on OpenAlexaff
Elsa Dupraz, Lav R. Varshney, François Leduc-Primeau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMemristorComputationArtificial neural networkKarush–Kuhn–Tucker conditionsComputer scienceNonlinear systemCovarianceInferencePower (physics)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceControl theory (sociology)MathematicsMathematical optimizationElectronic engineeringStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers Deep Neural Network (DNN) linear-nonlinear computations implemented on memristor cross-bar substrates. To address the case where true memristor conductance values may differ from their target values, it introduces a theoretical framework that characterizes the effect of conductance value variations on the final inference computation. With only second-order moment assumptions, theoretical results on tracking the mean, variance, and covariance of the layer-by-layer noisy computations are given. By allowing the possibility of amplifying certain signals within the DNN, power consumption is characterized and then optimized via KKT conditions. Simulation results verify the accuracy of the proposed analysis and demonstrate the significant power efficiency gains that are possible via optimization for a target mean squared error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207