MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197844041 · doi:10.2105/ajph.2021.306384

Sarki et al. Respond

2021· letter· fr· W3197844041 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed M. Sarki, Alex Ezeh, Saverio Stranges

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health · 2021
Typeletter
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental healthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sarki et al. Respond Ahmed M. SarkiPhD, MPH, Alex EzehPhD, and Saverio StrangesMD, PhD, MPH, FAHA Affiliation Ahmed M. Sarki is with the School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Kampala, Uganda, and the Family and Youth Health Initiative, Jigawa State, Nigeria. Alex Ezeh is with the Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, and the School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Saverio Stranges is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Department of Family Medicine, and The Africa Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, and the Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg. CopyRightCorrespondence should be sent to Ahmed M. Sarki, PhD, MPH, Assistant Professor, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, 9-11 Colonel Muammar Gaddafi Rd, PO Box 8842, Kampala, Uganda (e-mail: ahmed.sarki@aku.edu). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking the "Reprints" link. CONTRIBUTORS The authors contributed equally to this letter. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306384 Accepted: May 05, 2021 Published Online: August 31, 2021

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0110.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2680.129

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Public HealthSame topicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207