Urbi et Orbi. Les revues missionnaires catholiques québécoises au XXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour objectif d’effectuer un survol de l’histoire des revues missionnaires canadiennes-françaises au XXe siècle. Trois périodes façonnent cette histoire des revues missionnaires : la multiplication des revues dans le but d’informer et de propager la foi (1900-1944), les défis de la presse missionnaire (1945-1960) et les remises en question en lien avec un plus large processus de sécularisation (1961-2000). Ce survol permet une meilleure compréhension des activités apostoliques de l’Église canadienne-française en insistant sur les transformations matérielle et idéologique de ces revues. Au-delà de l’image projetée, du prosélytisme, des préjugés et du racisme qu’elles véhiculent, ces revues retracent l’évolution de l’Église catholique et de son mouvement missionnaire ainsi que celle de la société québécoise et de son rapport aux sociétés et aux cultures étrangères.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".