Self-Powered Load Sensing Circuitry for Total Knee Replacement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been a significant increase in the number of total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries over the past few years, particularly among active young and elderly people suffering from knee pain. Continuous and optimal monitoring of the load on the knee is highly desirable for designing more reliable knee implants. This paper focuses on designing a smart knee implant consisting of a triboelectric energy harvester and a frontend electronic system to process the harvested signal for monitoring the knee load. The harvester produces an AC signal with peak voltages ranging from 10 V to 150 V at different values of knee cyclic loads. This paper demonstrates the measurement results of a PCB prototype of the frontend electronic system fabricated to verify the functionality and feasibility of the proposed approach for a small range of cycling load. The frontend electronic system consists of a voltage processing unit to attenuate high peak voltages, a rectifier and a regulator to convert the input AC signal into a stabilized DC signal. The DC voltage signal provides biasing for the delta-sigma analog-to-digital converter (ADC). Thus, the output of the triboelectric harvester acts as both the power signal that is rectified/regulated and data signal that is digitized. The power consumption of the proposed PCB design is approximately <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$5.35~\mu \text{W}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> . Next, the frontend sensor circuitry is improved to accommodate a wider range of cyclic load. These results demonstrate that triboelectric energy harvesting is a promising technique for self-monitoring the load inside knee implants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".