Relationship Between Orthostatic Hypotension and Cognitive Functions in Multiple System Atrophy: A Longitudinal Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of orthostatic hypotension (OH) on cognitive functions in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) followed over time. Methods: Thirty-two MSA patients were enrolled and underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological battery; at baseline (T0) 15 out of 32 patients presented OH, assessed by means of orthostatic standing test. All patients underwent a follow-up (T1) evaluation 12 months after baseline. Thirteen out of 32 patients also underwent a second follow-up (T2) evaluation at 24 months. Changes over time on different neuropsychological tasks were compared between patients with and without OH by means of Mann-Whitney's U-test. Moreover, clinical categories of normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia were determined, and changes at T1 and T2 in global cognitive status were compared between patients with and without OH. Results: At T0, patients with OH had better performance on words/non-words repetition task (p = 0.02) compared to patients without OH. Compared to patients without OH, patients with OH performed worse on semantic association task (p < 0.01) at T1 and on Stroop test-error effect (p = 0.04) at T2. The percentage of patients with worsened cognitive status at T1 was higher among patients with OH than among patients without OH (93 vs. 59%, p = 0.03). OH (β = −4.67, p = 0.01), education (β = 0.45, p = 0.02), age (β = 0.19, p = 0.03), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment battery (MOCA) score at T0 (β = −0.26, p = 0.04) were significant predictors of global cognitive status worsening at T1. Discussion: We found that global cognitive status worsened at 1-year follow-up in 93% of patients with OH, and OH, along with age, education, and MOCA score, predicted cognitive worsening over time. To clarify the relationship between OH and cognitive dysfunction in MSA, we suggest the use of clinical categories of normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia in further longitudinal studies on MSA patients with and without OH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".